*   Blogs FrontPage   Home   AbuyogSter   Chat Room   Classifieds   Forum   Contact Us   *



Archive for the ‘Current Affairs’ Category

How politics is killing Tacloban

January 18th, 2010 by bong austero
Viewed 246 times, 2 so far today

This is my column today.

I was recently in Tacloban City where I inevitably found myself immersed in pre-election concerns and had a whiff of the stink of local politics.An unusual spectacle is unfolding in the electoral contest in the city. The incumbent mayor, Alfred Romualdez, is running for re-election. There’s really nothing wrong with his quest for re-election because he has not yet exceeded his term limit. However, his slate includes his father, Bejo Romualdez, who is running for vice mayor. If both win, Tacloban will have a father and son sitting as Mayor and Vice Mayor, respectively.

I know. This situation is not really unusual in this country. Various permutations of political dynasty exist in this country such as husband-and-wife teams sitting as mayor and congressman or father and son sitting as mayor and chairman head of the Sangguniang Kabataan. But I think not very many families have the audacity to actually want to corner both the posts of mayor and vice mayor of the same city.

What adds to the unusual situation is the fact that Bejo Romualdez is the immediate past City Mayor of Tacloban City and he bequeathed the post to his son, the incumbent. In short, he is settling for a lower position in the 2010 elections. The even more twisted thing is that the older Romualdez has been reportedly telling people in campaign sorties that the situation bodes well for Tacloban because this means that the mayor cannot misbehave since he—the father—is watching him.

That’s not it, yet. It gets even more outrageous. Former sexy actress Cristina Romualdez—Alfred’s wife—is also running for re-election as councilor and has made it known that she wants to win as first councilor of the city.

The electorate has irreverently dubbed the trio the Holy Trinity of Tacloban—the son, the father, and the wife. In a rather twisted turn of events, the Romualdezes have latched on to the joke by using the same as some kind of justification for the anomalous situation. The incumbent mayor has been publicly saying that if Catholics don’t have questions about the validity of the concept of the Holy Trinity, then they shouldn’t question Tacloban’s holy trinity. In Alfred’s words: “If there is a Holy Trinity in the Bible, then Tacloban City has its own trinity. Dynasties have existed since the time of Jesus Christ.”

I almost choked on the scallops I was eating when friends and relatives narrated the above to me. There were more reasons for consternation. Everyone had something juicy to contribute to the discussion about how the political situation in Tacloban City has degenerated to absurd levels.

There are 10 slots available for councilor of the city. There are 40 candidates who filed their certificates of candidacies. It stands to reason that anyone running for the post of mayor would field a complete slate. The Romualdez slate, however, is composed of 15 candidates for councilor. The Romualdezes want to convey the impression that they are so loved in Tacloban there’s a long list of people jumping all over themselves to be associated with them. Fielding 15 candidates for the 10 slots increases the chances of cornering majority of the seats of the City council—a highly contentious battleground in the last three years for the incumbent mayor on account of a very strong opposition—but it also smacks of cheap opportunism. What kind of a leader willingly encourages members of his team to openly fight amongst themselves while he watches benevolently waiting to raise the hands of the victors?

Putting up a brave fight against the Romualdezes is media man Bob Abellanosa; the man who for many years read the evening news for the local television channel. Abellanosa is not exactly the first choice among those at the dinner table but most of them were willing to cast their lot behind the guy firmly believing in the mantra “anybody but the Romualdezes.”

The political situation in Tacloban—something that has bordered on the absurd and the comical—has been simmering under the surface for quite some time now. The Romualdezes have only recently returned to power since they were thrown out with the Marcoses after the first Edsa revolution.

All over the city are tarpaulins of the handsome first couple of the city supposedly proclaiming the achievements they have made for the city. The joke among the citizenry is that whatever achievements are printed in the tarpaulins is unreadable as most of the space has been taken up by the huge picture of the very handsome couple. Some critics gleefully proclaim that that’s exactly the major achievements of the couple—they’ve prettified themselves.

The Romualdezes have been at odds with the Petillas for many years now. The Petillas have held sway over the provincial capitol since the matriarch Remedios Matin Petilla became governor a few years after the Romualdezes’ fall from grace. Petilla went on to become congressman and later on as deputy chairman of the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation. The current governor of Leyte is her son Jericho Petilla.

The conflict between the Petillas and the Romualdezes has resulted in competition that has reached almost farcical levels— whatever programs for the common people initiated by the provincial government has been replicated by the city government and vice versa. For example, the province has a singing contest designed to discover singing talents. The city government has its own contest, held just a block away from the venue of the provincial contest. Even the backdrops of the two competitions seem to compete amongst themselves in terms of size. The provincial and city governments also compete in terms of who has the better morning exercise sessions.

The city folk have come to see the competition as akin to the kapuso vs kapamilya contest not only because it has become entertaining but more because it has become quite shallow although most concede that the competition has also somehow resulted in more services being offered to citizens.

The problem is that the competition had become dysfunctional in many occasions such as during the most recent city fiesta when the provincial government and the city government hosted their own festivals. Reports have it that the street dancing related to one festival was rudely interrupted because activities related to the other festival cut through the street dancing venue. During the recent Palarong Pambansa, which was hosted by the provincial government, the city government reportedly refused to allow the use of certain facilities owned by the city.

The result of all these is that there is now a seeming exodus to relocate most businesses to the nearby town of Palo, which already hosts most government regional offices. SM is reportedly building its first mall in the region in Palo and the Petilla matriarch, Remedios Petilla, is now running for the post of mayor of the town. There is also the plan to move the provincial capitol to Palo eventually. If all these happen, Tacloban will most like degenerate into a shell of what it used to be and what it could have become. No wonder “have mercy on Tacloban City” is an oft-repeated plea that’s being whispered around by concerned citizens.

Bothered and bewildered

December 1st, 2009 by bong austero
Viewed 156 times

This was my column last Monday. The President announced she was running for Congress the same day this column came out.

Tomorrow is the deadline for the filing of candidacies for the May 2010 elections.As I write, the question that’s foremost in everyone’s mind is whether the President of the Republic will make history yet again by filing her candidacy as representative of the second district of Pampanga. In the last few days, we’ve seen what is being made to appear like a major clamor from her cabalens for her to represent them in Congress.

Quite frankly, the whole hullabaloo looks like a badly conceptualized, poorly staged moro moro acted out by awfully hammy actors. I haven’t been able to stomach watching those people declaim their appeal for the President to “please listen to them.” One of them delivered this hair-raising monologue about how the President is still young and how she is still their best hope in Congress. Even the first son, Representative Mikey Arroyo has joined in the chorus, making a dramatic appeal to “Her Excellency, my mother” to heed the people’s call. I know; it’s enough to make sober people run out of a room screaming.

I have a strong feeling President Gloria Arroyo will win if she does run for Congress. Randy David will give her a good fight, but my fearless forecast is that she will still win even in an honest and clean election. She will win for the same reason that the Marcoses have always won elections in Ilocos Norte or the Romualdezes have always won elections in Leyte despite their infamy. And I am not talking about recent elections—both families won elections in their home turfs barely a few years after their fall from grace. It’s the same reason why the Ampatuans will mostly likely still win some positions of power in Maguindanao despite the unspeakably evil massacre that happened there recently.

We all indulge in wishful thinking that the electorate has matured and that Filipinos are now more discerning in their choice of leaders. The reality, however, is that people in this country don’t get voted into office on the strength of what they are saying, or because of their platforms, or because of moral issues. People get elected into office because of highly personal, emotional, as well as practical reasons.

As can be expected, Mrs. Arroyo has done more than any other politician for her cabalens than any other politician especially in the last few months. Of course it can be argued that she and her administration also did a lot of really awful things for this country; it can even be pointed out that she brought shame and embarrassment to Kapampangans and to Filipinos in general, but to many voters in Pampanga, in her hometown of Lubao particularly, all those are abstract, ephemeral concepts that pale in comparison to the roads, bridges, public structures and other political largesse that they have received from her patronage.

All these will not make the whole idea right, or comprehensible, or even remotely logical. Why someone who has already reached the pinnacle of power would deign to settle for a lower elective post defies reason.

At the personal level, why someone would willingly put herself through the gauntlet again—subject one’s self to more humiliation and public ridicule—is something that baffles the mind. There’s the possibility of megalomania, of course, even perhaps extreme narcissism, or a bloated sense of self-importance. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, it has been said. People who are drunk with power become numb. All these are convenient analyses to explain this madcap idea of a President of a country running for a seat in Congress after her term.

But as Representative Teddyboy Locsin (who probably has the combined IQ of half the representatives in Congress) remarked publicly recently, the President is one smart woman. Mrs. Arroyo is a lot of things, but she is not stupid.

Of course she has not openly admitted that she will run for Congress, but her body language seems to confirm the message. It is within the bounds of reason that given her legendary short temper she could already have squashed the supposed clamor with a quick dismissal if she weren’t so inclined to heed it. The truth is that at the very least, she is playing coy and even seems tickled pink at the clamor of her sycophants.

So what then is the political masterplan behind all these attempts to confound the general electorate?

The general drift of the speculative drivel out there is that the President wants to run for Congress, become Speaker of the House, and then marshal forces to push Charter change ultimately leading to her installation as Prime Minister. There are a lot of gaps in this conspiracy theory, foremost of which is that it cannot happen without the support of the Senate and everyone knows there is absolutely no way Mrs. Arroyo is going to have enough senators supportive of her or of charter change. Let’s not act naïve here by thinking that any senator’s objection to Charter change is borne out of altruistic reason—the simple fact of the matter is that supporting Charter change is tantamount to political suicide on the part of any senator. They might as well hang themselves in public.

In addition, everyone knows the specter of having Mrs. Arroyo at the helm of the next government is anathema even among those who are politically neutral; let’s not talk anymore about the greater majority of people who hate her with a passion. Mrs. Arroyo becoming Prime Minister? It’s not going to happen.

There is the other scenario being floated of course: The President becoming Speaker of the House and using the vast resources she has presumably amassed as President to control the House of Representatives purportedly to protect herself and her allies from political persecution, or simply to make things difficult for the new administration in the event that the next administration is unfriendly or hostile toward her.

Again, there is a flaw in this logical deduction. The basic truth is that there is no need for all that rigmarole. This country has a rather dismal record of bringing to justice powerful people who have committed serious offenses and wrongdoings. The list includes the Estradas, the Marcoses, the Romualdezes, even the long list of former renegade military men who have not only escaped the so-called long arm of the law but have even bounced back to power. Even if Mrs. Arroyo isn’t in power anymore, she will still have allies, not to mention family members in power who can do everything to block her persecution.

We can all give this bothersome, bewildering enigma of the President’s political plans our best shot at analysis. Mrs. Arroyo rose to power and survived numerous crises because of a confluence of events that ordinary people would ascribe to destiny. Perhaps Mrs. Arroyo is waiting for—nay, anticipating—another confluence of events that would propel her to political center stage again. I think she is pushing her luck too far this time around.

Reactions to Lacson’s expose

October 25th, 2009 by Francis
Viewed 158 times, 1 so far today

This is my Manila Standard column last September 16, 2009.

The gamut of reactions to Senator Panfilo Lacson’s recent exposé on the shenanigans of Joseph Ejercito Estrada during his short-lived stint as President of the Republic ranged from curiosity, to open-mouth incredulity, to disdain, to resignation, and of course, condemnation.The problem with senatorial public confessions that come under the guise of a privilege speech delivered at the floor of the Senate is that they do not seem to serve any other purpose other than to attract media and public attention. The senator who is making the exposé cannot be held accountable for what he says during a privilege speech because of parliamentary immunity. As a result, quite a number of people think that privilege speeches often constitute unbridled abuse of parliamentary privilege. Thus, a lot of people can be forgiven for taking the content of privilege speeches with not just a grain, but perhaps bushels of salt.There are those who wonder what Lacson’s motives for attacking—I mean exposing—Estrada now. There are those who think that Lacson’s exposé is an act of survival. The metaphor that some people are using to support this theory is that of a drowning man who is splashing around, clutching at anything and anyone around him, in the process dragging them down with him.

But someone who is familiar with how things work among people in the military offers a different theory. He thinks that Lacson’s recent exposé is a carefully calculated strategy that is part of larger scheme. The metaphor being used to illustrate this theory is that of a game of chess. Presumably, Lacson’s exposé is a gambit; either a subtle message or a clear threat being sent to certain powerful people who may have the means to pry Lacson out of the treacherous waters he is immersed in at the moment. If we are to believe the scuttlebutt, there are many other powerful people—businessmen, politicians, government officials—who are now sleepless in Metro Manila.

There are those who were honestly and sincerely shocked by Lacson’s revelations particularly of its damaging portrayal of Manuel V. Pangilinan as a devious, manipulative businessman guilty of unethical practices. Prior to Lacson’s exposé , Pangilinan has been largely seen as a knight in shining armor. In fact, there is a movement that is operating covertly and its mission is to convince Pangilinan to run for president in 2010.

Lacson’s exposé unleashed once again speculative drivel regarding the real reason behind the Yuchengcos’ decision to let go of their business interest in the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. Given that PLDT is blue-chip company and given further that the Yuchengcos have never really been strapped for cash, the decision to sell to Pangilinan has been an enigma in the business community for many years now. There has also been a lot of speculation on the real cause of the family intramurals that led to the unceremonious exit of Alfonso Yuchengco III from the family’s main business enterprises around the time of the sale of the PLDT shares.

Lacson’s motives for the exposé are not the only ones certain quarters find questionable. The senator is also being put to task for the timing of his revelations—almost a decade since the alleged shenanigans happened! Why only now? Why didn’t he speak up during the Estrada impeachment trial, or during the Estrada’s trial at the Sandiganbayan? Lacson’s justification that Estrada was still his boss at the time does not really count in his favor and only serves to reinforce the notion that he was involved in and benefited from the tomfoolery. As can be expected, there are a lot of people out there who scorn Lacson’s attempt to fashion himself as a hero.

But the more prevalent reaction to Lacson’s exposé was one of resignation. Put another way, most people think we’ve been there before. The details in terms of how these were done, who were involved, and how much was the booty remain unclear but as far as many people are concerned, there is no mistaking the fact that the Estrada presidency was guilty of widespread corruption. There are those who argue that it really wasn’t the corruption per se that was unforgivable—it was really the brazenness in which people around Estrada did it. Of course Estrada’s famed profligacy, his sanctimoniousness, and his legendary absence of work ethics were just as contemptible and were major factors that fueled the movement that eventually ousted him out of office.

The general drift of opinions is that the actual booty may not be comparable to the large-scale larceny of the Arroyo cronies but only because the Estrada administration did not stay in office longer than the Arroyos.

To be fair, there are of course those who continue to think that Estrada didn’t do anything wrong while he was in power and that if there was ever a weakness on his part it was simply that he was generous to his friends to a fault. These are the people who think Lacson is simply using the former president, victimizing him all over again for the sole purpose of boosting his own political stock. One has to be a real Estrada fanatic to be able to pursue this kind of logical acrobatics but then again, we do have people in this country who believe that Jose Rizal is God or that the remains of Noah’s Ark are located at Mt. Banahaw.

Of course it is possible that Lacson’s exposé is precisely what he says it is: A courageous patriotic act. Perhaps Lacson truly has had an attack of conscience and is now intent on setting things right. His assertion that Estrada should not be allowed to become president again strikes a chord in many people’s hearts although truth to tell, an Estrada presidency has about a strong a chance as there being snow in Metro Manila in May 2010; definitely not with Noynoy Aquino and Manny Villar already in the running.

Why is it difficult to believe Lacson’s sincerity? It’s as much a reflection of our own level of cynicism as it is about Lacson’s track record as public servant.

We’re a people that has been witness to a lot of controversies and strings of exposé—none of which resulted in a conviction or in major reforms. Also, we do have a surfeit of this exposé business —it’s almost like a cottage industry in this country. Our media networks thrive on these things and they churn out all kinds of dirt about practically everyone on their shows. Small wonder really that most of us have gotten numb to these things since our level of tolerance has already been stretched so wide to accommodate all possible kinds of betrayal of public trust.

And of course, Lacson is hardly the epitome of moral righteousness. Because he has distinguished himself for his penchant for using privilege speeches in attacking his adversaries, many among us can be forgiven for doubting his sincerity this time around.